Sunday, September 16, 2007

Iraq War Was Really For Oil?

Our elder statesman of finance, Alan Greenspan, has been delivering some critique to the policies of President Bush's economic policies. It seems the latest of his finger pointing is claiming the Iraq was was really for oil. Something many Americans already believed since Hussein was a threat to our "security" oil supplies in the Middle East.

But why wait now to say something? Is it because he has a guilty conscious for not saying anything while he was in office? Is it because now that he's a "regular" citizen that he's beginning to see things from America's point of view? No.....wait, okay. It looks like Greenspan is turning Hollywood. Instead of leaking a sex tape, Greenspan (not that anyone could watch an entire tape of Greenspan getting it on) decided to be on the controversial side. And for what?

Well tomorrow it looks like he's publishing his "long-awaited" memoirs. Marketing agents know that controvery receive's FREE publicity. Look Greenspan, we were not born yesterday. I'm not "waiting" for your memoirs. Why couldn't you speak up while you were in office? Seems like your motives to create larger sales is because of the lacking in the crotch area. I'm not a big fan of Bush either, but don't be a wimp and wait until your out of office to say something America needed to hear thousands of deaths ago.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Testing.....Testies.....


Just wanted to fyi to be a little patient with this site. I'm testing out a new style of blog posting that will enable to clearly communicate myself more freely on important topics that promote change and enable for us to think sans handcuffs.

Thanks!!

Google Wants Lunar Landing

The group whose $10 million prize spurred privately financed rocketeers to send a small piloted craft to the cusp of space in 2004 has issued a new challenge: an unmanned moon shot.

With the audacious new contest comes a much bigger prize - up to $25 million, paid for by Google, the ubiquitous Internet company.

The "Google Lunar X Prize" was announced Thursday in Los Angeles at Wired magazine's NextFest. The contest calls for entrants to land a rover on the moon that will be able to travel at least 500 meters, or 0.31 miles, and send high-resolution video, still images and other data back home.

The X Prize Foundation saw the new contest as one of "the grand challenges of our time that we can use to move people forward," said Peter Diamandis, chairman and chief executive of the foundation.




The prize for reaching the moon and completing the basic tasks of roving and sending video and data will bring the winner $20 million, according to the contest rules. An additional $5 million would be awarded for other tasks that include roving more than 5,000 meters or sending back images of artifacts like lunar landers from the Apollo program.

Carnegie Mellon University immediately announced that a roboticist on its faculty, William Whittaker, would be pulling together a team to seek the prize.


Why would anyone sign up for a challenge that will almost certainly cost more than the prize will bring? John Logsdon, the director of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University, said, "There are a variety of reasons to do it, including ego gratification, including loss-leader reputation building, including a fascination with doing things in space. I don't think they're driven by the amount of the prize."

Logsdon said the goal was realistic once a launch vehicle is obtained. "Russia and the U.S. did that sort of thing 40 years ago," he said. "The technologies aren't easy, but with all the experience in industrial robots and sensor devices, I don't see any reason why you couldn't put together a robotic machine that could meet these requirements."

The $20 million grand prize will be available until Dec. 31, 2012, and then will drop to $15 million for two years.

The new contest follows the path of the original Ansari X Prize, which was won by SpaceShipOne, a manned spacecraft designed by Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites and financed by Paul Allen, a co-founder of Microsoft.

That prize was paid for through a special insurance policy secured by Anousheh Ansari, a telecommunications entrepreneur in Texas and a board member of the X Prize Foundation who has since orbited the earth aboard the International Space Station. Rutan is designing a second-generation spacecraft called SpaceShipTwo that will be used by Richard Branson's space tourism company, Virgin Galactic.

The new X Prize, Diamandis said, grew out of research performed last year for NASA as a contest that the space agency would sponsor. The research suggested that six or seven contenders could be expected to try for the prize, but NASA ultimately backed away from financing the project, Diamandis said.


Then, in March, Diamandis pitched the idea to Google's co-founder, Larry Page, who sits on the board of the X Prize foundation. "Sounds like a lot of fun," he told Diamandis. The multimillion-dollar project, Page said, would be "doable," but his Google co-founder, Sergey Brin, would have to sign on as well. This also happened quickly, Diamandis recalled.

NASA has announced plans to return astronauts to the moon as early as 2020. But without the need to keep humans alive or to make a return trip, the X Prize trips will be simpler.

A number of successful entrepreneurs from the world of computing and the Internet, like Allen, have pursued childhood fascination with space with efforts to create real spacecraft. Elon Musk, a founder of PayPal, has developed rockets through his company, Space Exploration Technologies, and Jeffrey Bezos, the founder of Amazon.com, is developing rockets at a facility he owns in West Texas.

Roger Launius, who heads the division of space history at the National Air and Space Museum of the Smithsonian Institution, expressed enthusiasm for the new competition, which he said "might unleash a kind of furor of innovation" and heighten interest in space exploration.

"It's certainly a challenge that is worthy," he said. But he also expressed worries that the robotic adventurers would head to the site of the Apollo 11 landing, a prospect he said was troubling since "the last thing I want to see happen is to see Tranquility Base disturbed."

Source: International Herald Tribune
Google Logo: Google.com
Lunar Team Image: Cnet.com

Friday, September 14, 2007

Beijing Unveils the World's Largest Building (when they add the roof....)

China offered a first glimpse into the world’s biggest airport terminal yesterday and admitted that the £1.8 billion colossus will soon be too small to cope with demand.

The new Terminal 3 will allow 90 million passengers to pass through Beijing Capital International Airport by 2012. That compares with the 67.7 million currently handled by Heathrow, the world’s busiest airport.

The building, designed by Lord Foster of Thames Bank, is on one of the largest construction sites on Earth. At the height of the project 50,000 workers were hammering and welding on site, pouring 1.8 million cubic metres (400 million gallons) of concrete and using half a million tonnes of steel.

The terminal’s soaring golden roofs, scattered with raised triangles to resemble a dragon’s scaly back, and monumental red pillars pay homage to Chinese imperial architecture. Its 790m-wide (2,600ft-wide) roof, Cana-dian-built automatic mass-transit system and 60km (40 miles) of baggage carriers are testimony to Beijing’s determination to have the most modern facilities – whatever the cost.


Terminal 3 has taken less than four years from start to finish – Britain needed more than that just to debate building Terminal 5 at Heathrow. It will cover nearly a million square metres (10.8 million square feet), dwarfing the 400,000 or so square metres of Terminal 5.

Yet, although it will reduce pressure on the limited resources of Beijing, it will not be enough. Zhang Zhizhong, general manager of Beijing Capital Airport Holdings, said that a working group had been set up last year to choose the site for a second airport for the city. It will be one of 48 being planned across the country.

He admitted that air traffic growth in China was rapidly outpacing forecasts of 14 to 15 per cent for the period from 2006 to 2010. In the first half of this year growth hit 19 per cent, and aviation authorities have raised safety concerns. Mr Zhang said: “The challenge we face for safety is rather big.”


Beijing airport has leapt from No 15 in the world, in terms of passengers, in 2005 to No 9 last year and is now in eighth position. Mr Zhang said: “We often hear people say that the civil aviation administration of China is lucky and we admit that, but we are making huge efforts and huge investment in safety.”

China has had no big accidents for three years, but in the previous few years reported several disasters. The civil administration said recently: “A major reason for having nine accidents between 1992 and 1994 was growth had been too rapid for the industry to cope with flight safety.”

In the four years to 2000, China pressed into service 111 new aircraft. Between 2001 and 2005 it added 336, and expects an increase of 725 by 2010 that will expand its fleet to nearly 2,000. Terminal 3 is scheduled to open in February. Officials said that it was too early to set a date for its first flight.



Source: The Times
Images: fosterandpartners.com